WWF Admits “Sorrow” Over Human Rights Abuses


BuzzFeed Information has reporters around the globe bringing you reliable tales and explosive investigations. To assist preserve this information free, develop into a member.


One of many world’s largest charities knew for years that it was funding alleged human rights abusers however repeatedly failed to deal with the problem, a prolonged, long-delayed report revealed on Tuesday.

A BuzzFeed Information investigation first uncovered in March 2019 how WWF, the beloved nonprofit with the cuddly panda emblem, financed and outfitted park rangers accused of beating, torturing, sexually assaulting, and murdering scores of individuals. In response, WWF instantly commissioned an “unbiased assessment” led Navi Pillay, a former United Nations commissioner for human rights.

The 160-page assessment, which has now been revealed on-line, corroborates issues uncovered BuzzFeed Information in Nepal, Cameroon, the Republic of the Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The report claimed the panel was prevented the COVID-19 pandemic from touring to areas the place the abuses reportedly occurred.

The assessment discovered that WWF had failed repeatedly to observe “its personal commitments to respect human rights” — commitments that aren’t simply required regulation however important to “the conservation of nature.”


Do you’ve a tip about one thing the general public deserves to know? E mail the authors at tom.warren@buzzfeed.com or katie.baker@buzzfeed.com. Or you possibly can attain out securely at suggestions.buzzfeed.com.


In a assertion issued in response to the assessment, WWF expressed “deep and unreserved sorrow for individuals who have suffered,” and stated that abuses park rangers “horrify us and go in opposition to all of the values for which we stand.” The charity acknowledged its shortcomings and welcomed the suggestions, saying “we will and can do extra.”

Pillay’s assessment declined to deal with whether or not high-level executives, who BuzzFeed Information discovered had been conscious of “accelerating” violence at at the very least one wildlife park as early as January 2018, had been accountable for the charity’s missteps.

Within the Congo Basin, the place WWF did an “particularly weak” job fulfilling its human rights commitments, the wildlife charity didn’t totally examine accounts of homicide, rape, and torture out of worry that authorities companions would “react negatively to an effort to research previous human rights abuses,” the panel discovered. There and elsewhere, WWF supplied technical and monetary assist to park rangers, identified domestically as “eco-guards,” even after studying about comparable, horrifying allegations — and, in some instances, after damning opinions commissioned the non-profit itself confirmed “severe and widespread” experiences of abuse.

The report discovered “no formal mechanism in place for WWF to learn of alleged abuses throughout anti-poaching missions” in Nepal, regardless of torture, rape, and homicide allegations starting from the early 2000s to this previous July, when park officers had been alleged to have crushed an Indigenous youth and destroyed properties of a area people. “WWF must know what is going on on the bottom the place it really works” in an effort to fulfill its personal human rights insurance policies, the report stated.


Frank Bienewald / Getty Photos

A river in Nepal’s Chitwan Nationwide Park.

General, WWF paid too little consideration to credible abuse allegations, didn’t assemble a system for victims to make complaints, and painted an excessively rosy image of its anti-poaching conflict in public communications, the report discovered. “Sadly, WWF’s commitments to implement its social insurance policies haven’t been adequately and persistently adopted via,” the report’s authors wrote.

WWF has supported efforts to struggle wildlife crime for many years. Though native governments formally make use of and pay park rangers who patrol nationwide parks and guarded wildlife reserves, in a variety of nations throughout Africa and Asia WWF has supplied essential funding to make their jobs doable. The charity has framed its campaign in opposition to poaching within the hardened phrases of conflict.

In a multipart sequence, BuzzFeed Information discovered that WWF’s conflict on poaching got here with civilian casualties: impoverished villagers dwelling close to the parks. On the time, WWF responded that lots of BuzzFeed’s assertions did “not match our understanding of occasions” — but the charity swiftly overhauled lots of its human rights insurance policies after publication.

Within the US, the sequence spurred a bipartisan investigation and proposed laws that will prohibit the federal government from awarding cash to worldwide conservation teams that fund or assist human rights violations. It additionally prompted a freeze of funds the Inside Division, a assessment the Authorities Accountability Workplace, and separate authorities probes within the UK and Germany.

The brand new assessment gives extra suggestions for the charity to enhance its oversight, together with hiring extra human rights specialists, conducting stronger due diligence earlier than committing to conservation tasks, signing human rights commitments with WWF’s authorities and regulation enforcement companions within the area, and establishing efficient criticism techniques in order that Indigenous folks can extra simply report abuse.

The assessment discovered that there was no “constant and unified effort” throughout WWF’s community of workplaces around the globe to “deal with complaints about human rights abuses” till 2018.

Lots of the panel’s findings pointed on to the highest: “Commitments to satisfy the duty to respect human rights must be accepted on the most senior degree of the establishment,” the panel wrote. Though all of WWF’s workplaces within the Congo Basin fall underneath the direct authority of WWF Worldwide, workers at its headquarters in Gland, Switzerland did little to supervise the group’s work there.

WWF Worldwide additionally didn’t present clear steering to native workplaces about easy methods to implement its human rights commitments. For instance, there have been no network-wide norms about easy methods to work with regulation enforcement and park rangers. Consequently, every program workplace “was left itself to develop – or not – codes of conduct, coaching supplies, situations for supporting rangers, and procedures for responding to allegations of abuse.”

“Finally, the duty was on WWF Worldwide and the WWF Community as a complete to make sure that the allegations of human rights abuses eco-guards to which WWF was offering monetary and technical assist had been correctly addressed,” the panel wrote.


Ezequiel Becerra / Getty Photos

WWF Worldwide Director Common Marco Lambertini

Final October BuzzFeed Information revealed that each Director Common Marco Lambertini and Chief Working Officer Dominic O’Neill personally reviewed a WWF-commissioned report documenting “accelerating” accounts of violence WWF-backed guards in Cameroon. That report was despatched to higher-ups in January 2018 — greater than a yr earlier than BuzzFeed Information started exposing comparable abuses. But Pillay’s assessment stated little about whether or not WWF executives had been accountable for the charity’s failings.

As an alternative the assessment targeted on WWF’s advanced system, underneath which particular person program workplaces associate with nations “with apparently very restricted session or oversight from WWF Worldwide,” even when WWF Worldwide is legally accountable. This obscured “clear strains of duty and accountability,” leading to “difficulties and confusion” and “ineffective” makes an attempt to deal with human rights, the panel wrote.

The panel couldn’t discover a single contract between WWF Worldwide and its associate nations that contained provisions regarding human rights duties or the rights of Indigenous folks.

The panel additionally criticized WWF’s press briefings at size, saying it wanted to be “extra forthcoming in regards to the challenges it faces” and “extra clear about the way it responds when confronted with allegations of human rights abuses related to actions that it helps.” In some instances, “it’s clear that to keep away from fuelling criticism WWF determined to not publish commissioned experiences, to downplay info acquired, or to overstate the effectiveness of its proposed responses.”

An inner deal with selling “excellent news” appears “to have led to a tradition” during which program workplaces “have been unwilling to share or escalate the complete extent of their information about allegations of human rights abuses due to concern about scaring off donors or offending state companions,” the report stated. “WWF in any respect ranges must be extra clear each internally and externally in regards to the challenges it faces in selling conservation and respecting human rights. Equally essential, it should be extra forthright in regards to the effectiveness, or lack of effectiveness, of its efforts to beat these challenges.”

The report attracted speedy criticism from outstanding voices who stated it didn’t totally acknowledge the charity’s duty for abuses in opposition to Indigenous folks. Stephen Corry, the director of Survival Worldwide, the tribal rights advocacy group, stated “the report echoes earlier WWF responses in passing the blame onto ‘authorities rangers.’” A spokesperson for Rainforest Basis UK stated the report “fails to take duty” for WWF’s shortcomings “or challenge a honest apology to the various people who’ve suffered human rights abuses carried out of their title.”

The Forest Peoples Program, an Indigenous rights group that has reported abuses to WWF, stated the report confirmed the necessity for all wildlife charities to take a tough have a look at themselves.

“The human rights abuses suffered Indigenous peoples and native communities listed within the report spotlight basic points that come up throughout the conservation sector as a complete, not remoted to WWF,” stated Helen Tugendhat, program coordinator on the Forest Peoples Program. “We urge different conservation organizations in addition to conservation funders to learn this report intently and consider and amend their very own practices.”



Supply hyperlink