H.R 1 is Democrats’ newest try to break democracy


The assault on the American republic is so unrelenting in Washington proper now, it’s onerous to single out any single Democrat overreach as having the potential to do essentially the most injury.

But when I had to decide on, I might choose H.R. 1, which is 800 pages of attempting to be sure that no election in america would ever once more be unstealable, if that’s a phrase.

It handed within the Home final week on a straight party-line vote of 220-210. Not one Democrat broke ranks, now that the sometimes-freethinking likes of Reps. Dan Lipinski and Tulsi Gabbard have lastly been purged from the celebration.

Listed below are only a handful of the provisions, used to such nice success in a handful of blue city districts within the presidential election of 2020, now to be codified nationally.

No voter ID required, anyplace.

No extra necessities for mail-in votes to be notarized or signed witnesses.

No extra legal guidelines towards poll harvesting.

Identical-day voter registration nationwide and 15 days of early voting — obligatory.

“Late” ballots must be counted for 10 days after the election.

Poll harvesters working for far-left, George Soros-type teams might flip in limitless — limitless! — numbers of ballots.

Regardless of the state legal guidelines require, convicted felons might vote in presidential elections.

H.R. 1 would additionally make it nearly unattainable to purge outdated rolls of lifeless, unlawful or since-moved voters, you already know, like the person born in 1820 who was nonetheless a registered voter in Michigan final November.

It expands computerized voter registration, equivalent to signing up everybody with a driver’s license, even in Democrat states like California that challenge licenses to a whole bunch of 1000’s of unlawful immigrants.

The place are the UN election observers when you actually need them? If Saddam Hussein had tried to ram via one-tenth of this fraud in Iraq again within the day, Jimmy Carter would have had a match.

All the above is only a tiny pattern of what’s in H.R. 1 to ensure the Democrats no means have to fret about dropping one other nationwide election. Within the Orwellian spirit of the occasions, H.R. 1 is named the “For the Folks Act,” as a result of it’s precisely the other.

You realize, simply because the “Inexpensive Care Act” made well being care unaffordable, simply because the “Equality Act” would give organic males the “equal” proper to compete in girls’s athletics,
and simply as in Massachusetts, the “Safe Communities Act” would have made everybody much less protected handing out driver’s licenses to fentanyl-dealing unlawful immigrants.

So far as H.R. 1 goes, we’re being assured that no less than this time, we don’t have fear in regards to the Democrats’ mad makes an attempt to Third World our elections. You realize, the filibuster rule within the Senate and all that. Personally, I’m not all that assured of Republican backbone anyplace, however particularly not in Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell’s caucus.

The truth that not a single Home Democrat was prepared to say no to this abomination tells you all it is advisable to learn about the place that celebration is.

Keep in mind, Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, et al., nonetheless haven’t rounded up a majority of their caucus to log off on their try to determine a “path to citizenship” for the 11 million unlawful immigrants, who’re in all probability extra like 30 million now.

The Democrats are frightened of principally repealing each sane immigration regulation written over the past 100 years, however haven’t any comparable compunction about getting rid of each accountable precaution the states have taken to make sure honest and free elections.

The truth is, H.R. 1 isn’t sufficient for lots of those Democrats. Rep. Ayanna Pressley even supplied an modification to decrease the voting age to 16, as a result of youngsters right now are so … clever? Effectively-educated? What?

Reducing the voting age went down, however not for lack of Democrat assist. The comrades within the caucus supported it, 125-93.

As for felons being allowed to vote as soon as they’re out of jail, that’s not even “inclusive” sufficient for the likes of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. Do not forget that in the course of the 2020 primaries, Bernie mentioned he supported the suitable of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to vote from his cell on the federal Supermax jail in Florence, Colo.

Tsarnaev was a Muslim terrorist who immigrated right here as an “asylee,” and who had lived in Cambridge on welfare, alongside along with his whole household together with his serial-killing older brother, till he determined to start massacring native-born infidels.

Who do you suppose Tsarnaev would have voted for from loss of life row final 12 months? Trump or Biden?

The Democrats’ passage of H.R. 1 got here the identical week that two Democrat metropolis councilors in New Jersey have been indicted a federal grand jury for alleged voter fraud, and as a state choose in Mississippi ordered a brand new municipal election in a small metropolis after it turned out that 78% of the absentee ballots within the earlier election have been fraudulently submitted.

All these “reforms,” even with out the blessing of the For the Folks Act.

In the meantime, in Massachusetts, the brand new speaker of the Home, 74-year-old Ron Mariano, is transferring to increase common mail-in voting right here and the Republican management didn’t elevate a finger in objection. The truth is, Rep. Brad Jones, the $147,497-a-year minority chief, signed off on it.

Common mail-in voting. What might presumably go improper?



Supply hyperlink