Canvassing Board rejects ballots with mismatched signatures as 2020 Election involves an finish | 2020 Election

Ballots from 84 voters in Jefferson County have been tossed out as election officers finalized outcomes from the 2020 Common Election.

Three ballots in that batch of rejects have been despatched to the Jefferson County Prosecutor’s Workplace for additional motion, however members of the Jefferson County Canvassing Board indicated they didn’t suppose that trio of voters have been deliberately attempting to vote greater than as soon as on this yr’s election.

The 2020 election has been scrutinized like no different in current historical past, with President Donald Trump persevering with to falsely declare the vote was “rigged” and Republicans submitting lawsuits throughout a number of states in a failing effort handy Trump a second time period.

In Jefferson County, turnout hit 90.04 % — second within the state solely to San Juan County, which reported a turnout of 90.76 final week.

Jefferson County officers mentioned early voting allowed elections workers to tally 20,527 votes on Election Day; or 82.2 % of all ballots solid. 

Total, ballots have been counted from 24,948 registered voters in Jefferson County.

“It was nice; it was great, I actually couldn’t be extra comfortable,” mentioned Jefferson County Election Coordinator Quinn Grewell. “It simply went so clean, particularly throughout a pandemic.”

“For it being my first presidential election, I used to be tremendous stoked it went properly; every little thing went so properly,” she mentioned.

The Jefferson County Canvassing Board met early final week to overview 87 ballots that had been challenged and have been referred to the board.

The board instantly rejected 10 of the ballots as a result of they have been postmarked after Nov. 3, Election Day.

One other 40 have been tossed as a result of voters didn’t put their signature on the return envelope that comes with mail-in ballots.

Every canvassing board member then reviewed every poll — one after the other — out of a batch of 31 that had questionable signatures; signatures that didn’t match voter signatures on file. 

The vast majority of the
31 ballots have been shortly dispatched the canvassing board, made up of County Commissioner Greg Brotherton, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Lawyer Philip Hunsucker, and Chief Deputy Auditor Brenda Huntingford.

At one finish of the convention room on the second flooring of the Jefferson County Courthouse, Grewell set two trays: a inexperienced one for accepted ballots, and a purple one for rejects.

For every contested poll, board members in contrast the poll return envelope with its signature, and one other web page with the particular person’s voting report that displayed their signature that was on file.

Board members supplied their fast takes on why the signatures matched or didn’t.

On some, it was the evaluation {that a} voter’s signature had modified over time.

For others, it was merely sloppiness.

“This can be a robust one. It seems like somebody has gotten previous,” Brotherton mentioned as he examined a questionable signature. “I’ll go ‘No.’”

The others agreed, and it was on to the subsequent challenged poll. 

Holding up the sixth questionable one, Brotherton famous, “I’ll attest it’s exhausting to do a capital G persistently.”

“Mine is persistently dangerous,” Grewell supplied.

Brotherton requested to see the envelope, and a fast “no” adopted.

On the subsequent poll, Huntingford mentioned it was signed in a means that “seems like an entire totally different final identify.”

It went into the rejection tray.

Extra would observe, with some signatures being removed from related.

“C’mon, man!” Hunsucker exclaimed when evaluating two side--side signatures, drawing fun from these within the room.

Grewell informed board members that the county made makes an attempt to contact individuals who had ballots that have been being challenged, to provide them an opportunity to confirm their signatures.

Some cellphone numbers from registration varieties have been now not in use, and Grewell famous that folks usually appear to vary telephones today, however fewer nonetheless maintain their numbers up to date.

One other return envelope prompted a chuckle from the board, which apparently had a doodle on the signature line, fairly than a signature.

It was summarily slapped down.

“It’s a pleasant panorama, although,” Brotherton mentioned.

“That’s one other one of many ‘C’mon on!’ class,” Hunsucker added.

Nearing the tip of the contested ballots, and one other pair of signatures that didn’t line up, Hunsucker seemed on the signatures the other way up, after which noticed sufficient similarities to just accept the poll.

Brotherton tried the identical method.

“That G may be very related. I’ll go ‘sure,’ too,” he mentioned.

The following poll was referred to the prosector’s workplace, and fell into the “Different Than Voter” class. 

Grewell mentioned it appeared the voter signed and submitted their very own poll, then additionally signed a family member’s poll with their signature.

Brotherton mentioned it seemed to be an inadvertent mistake, and Hunsucker agreed {that a} warning letter from the prosecutor can be the possible results of a referral.

One other poll was rejected and referred to the prosecutor for a similar cause; signed a family member who additionally solid a poll.

One provisional poll was accepted the board.

A voter despatched in a poll return envelope however not the poll; a provisional poll was solid as a substitute, which was accepted the board.

One case was reviewed of an individual who voted twice.

The primary poll despatched in was unsigned, so the voter went on-line, bought a brand new poll issued, and solid the brand new one, as properly.

The board determined to reject the unsigned poll, however to rely the one which was despatched with a signature later.

After 45 minutes, the board had completed its overview of all contested ballots.

Grewell informed the board that voters had been particularly engaged throughout this election cycle. Individuals tracked their ballots on-line to verify that they had been acquired.

“We had much less challenges this election; individuals have been proper up to the mark,” she mentioned.

“I’m glad individuals have been taking note of the principles,” Brotherton mentioned.

The decision quantity was excessive the election interval, and three individuals have been nonetheless ready to vote at eight p.m. on Election Evening. They have been flagged as eligible to vote, Grewell mentioned.

Grewell famous that processing ballots was made a lot simpler this yr as a result of a Mail Poll Verifier that was acquired the county; it’s a machine that captures and shops photographs of poll return envelopes and their signatures.

“It streamlines our course of, for one, and it eliminates among the dealing with of these ballots,” Grewell mentioned. 

Supply hyperlink